- Final Score: Colorado State 33, Fresno State 31
- Fresno State: Brandstater: 207 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT; Matthews/Harding/Miller: 33 rushes, 161 yards, 1 TD; Defense: 2 sacks, 2 TOs
- Colorado State: Farris: 277 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT; Johnson: 20 rushes, 94 yards, 1 TD; Defense: 3 TOs
My Thoughts: Of course AccuScore isn't working on ESPN, and of course, the guy previewing the game didn't throw in any custom simulations, so I guess you're just going to have to trust me on this one. Colorado State was awful last year (3-9), but had a nice bounce back this year (6-6). I like how well they protect the QB, only allowing ten sacks all year. Plus, Colorado State has won the last two head-to-head meetings.
Colorado State (+3)
St. Petersburg Bowl: Memphis vs. South Florida (4:30, ESPN2)
Head to Head Matchup | Tigers Offense | Bulls Defense |
| | | Points/Game | 28.3 (87) | 20.5 (56) | Rush Yards/Game | 205.6 (33) | 97.7 (23) | Pass Yards/Game | 226.6 (90) | 194.1 (100) | Total Yards/Game | 432.2 (34) | 291.8 (28) | Third Down Pct. | 47.5% (25) | 37.0% (94) | Fourth Down Pct. | 58.8% (61) | 33.3% (121) | Sacks | 18 (67) | 22 (132) | Sack Yards | -140 (96) | -149 (131) | Rushing TDs | 24 (56) | 11 (40) | Passing TDs | 19 (93) | 15 (98) | Carries/Game | 510 (35) | 406 (71) | Yards/Carry | 4.8 (46) | 2.9 (22) | Completion Pct. | 57.0% (85) | 53.4% (48) | Yards/Pass Attempt | 6.8 (126) | 6.8 (119) | Pass Rating | 123.4 (135) | 119.0 (90) | Avg. NCAA Football Ranking | 48.6 | 53.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Matchup | Tigers Defense | Bulls Offense |
| | | Points/Game | 26.0 (136) | 26.5 (108) | Rush Yards/Game | 146.3 (132) | 159.8 (94) | Pass Yards/Game | 195.7 (105) | 237.6 (74) | Total Yards/Game | 341.9 (108) | 397.4 (66) | Third Down Pct. | 36.2% (80) | 47.2% (28) | Fourth Down Pct. | 91.7% (245) | 46.2% (225) | Sacks | 14 (202) | 26 (173) | Sack Yards | -81 (221) | -218 (211) | Rushing TDs | 18 (129) | 22 (82) | Passing TDs | 16 (104) | 15 (156) | Carries/Game | 377 (36) | 469 (71) | Yards/Carry | 4.7 (198) | 4.1 (116) | Completion Pct. | 53.3% (38) | 62.3% (50) | Yards/Pass Attempt | 7.4 (182) | 7.6 (69) | Pass Rating | 127.3 (139) | 131.0 (87) | Avg. NCAA Football Ranking | 93.4 | 73.2 |
|
|
| Simulations:
- Final Score: South Florida 34, Memphis 23
- Memphis: Hall: 163 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT; Steele: 78 yards, 1 TD; Defense: 3 sacks, 4 TOs
- South Florida: Grothe: 247 yards, 2 TDs, 2 INTs; Ford/Plancher/Grothe: 28 rushes, 134 yards, 2 TDs; Defense: 2 sacks, 2 TOs
My Thoughts: In a de facto home game for South Florida, they have opened up as the heavy favorites against the Tigers. A non-conference opponent is just what USF needed. They went 5-0 in non-conference games this year. Despite the fact that they finished up the year losing four of their last five games, they still have a pretty strong ground game and have not been affected by injuries. The thing that concerns me is the play of Matt Grothe for USF. He is prone to making mistakes. If the Bulls take the game out of his hands, and rely on their ground game to take out a weak Memphis front, USF should have no problem covering.
South Florida (-13)
Las Vegas Bowl: BYU vs. Arizona (8:00, ESPN)
Head to Head Matchup | Cougars Offense | Wildcats Defense |
| | | Points/Game | 35.3 (30) | 21.3 (66) | Rush Yards/Game | 135.9 (143) | 132.3 (84) | Pass Yards/Game | 308.9 (13) | 169.8 (38) | Total Yards/Game | 444.8 (27) | 302.1 (39) | Third Down Pct. | 55.9% (3) | 32.5% (35) | Fourth Down Pct. | 70.0% (15) | 50.0% (18) | Sacks | 20 (87) | 21 (138) | Sack Yards | -163 (143) | -138 (153) | Rushing TDs | 19 (106) | 16 (97) | Passing TDs | 34 (12) | 11 (28) | Carries/Game | 392 (175) | 379 (41) | Yards/Carry | 4.2 (100) | 4.2 (156) | Completion Pct. | 68.9% (14) | 54.8% (65) | Yards/Pass Attempt | 8.3 (32) | 5.6 (19) | Pass Rating | 157.9 (21) | 104.0 (28) | Avg. NCAA Football Ranking | 41.9 | 45.7 |
Matchup | Cougars Defense | Wildcats Offense |
| | | Points/Game | 21.2 (65) | 37.1 (23) | Rush Yards/Game | 144.2 (122) | 164.0 (90) | Pass Yards/Game | 206.5 (129) | 237.3 (75) | Total Yards/Game | 350.7 (122) | 401.3 (58) | Third Down Pct. | 44.6% (207) | 44.7% (49) | Fourth Down Pct. | 44.4% (102) | 26.7% (97) | Sacks | 18 (165) | 27 (177) | Sack Yards | -107 (188) | -173 (152) | Rushing TDs | 16 (100) | 31 (27) | Passing TDs | 15 (89) | 22 (67) | Carries/Game | 446 (144) | 476 (63) | Yards/Carry | 3.9 (108) | 4.1 (111) | Completion Pct. | 60.4% (171) | 64.2% (35) | Yards/Pass Attempt | 6.6 (95) | 7.6 (57) | Pass Rating | 124.5 (119) | 142.6 (45) | Avg. NCAA Football Ranking | 87.5 | 51.2 |
Simulations:
- Final Score: Arizona 33, BYU 27
- BYU: Hall: 286 yards, 2 TDs, 2 INTs; Unga: 19 rushes, 60 yards, 1 TD; Defense: 3 sacks, 3 TOs
- Arizona: Tuitama: 204 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT
- Grigsby/Antolin/Smith: 31 rushes, 109 yards, 2 TDs; Defense: 2 sacks, 4 TOs
My Thoughts: BYU has one of the nation's finest QBs in Max Hall, but he will face a stiff challenge taking on 'Zona's pass D, ranking 38th against the pass and 8th in yards/attempt. BYU has played a fairly easy schedule, but when they have gone up against above-average defenses, they have struggled. Hall threw no TDs and seven picks against Utah and TCU. Arizona held Southern Cal to 17 points, so that may give you an idea of what this D is capable of.
Arizona (-3)
Sunday, December 21
New Orleans Bowl: Southern Miss vs. Troy (8:15, ESPN)
Head to Head Matchup | Golden Eagles Offense | Trojans Defense |
| | | Points/Game | 30.7 (61) | 20.6 (57) | Rush Yards/Game | 196.3 (43) | 139.8 (110) | Pass Yards/Game | 238.2 (72) | 180.4 (59) | Total Yards/Game | 434.5 (32) | 320.3 (62) | Third Down Pct. | 44.3% (51) | 36.0% (75) | Fourth Down Pct. | 70.8% (13) | 26.9% (241) | Sacks | 16 (45) | 32 (35) | Sack Yards | -128 (81) | -240 (21) | Rushing TDs | 28 (37) | 15 (89) | Passing TDs | 21 (74) | 16 (115) | Carries/Game | 494 (43) | 479 (202) | Yards/Carry | 4.8 (47) | 3.5 (58) | Completion Pct. | 57.2% (63) | 54.5% (59) | Yards/Pass Attempt | 6.8 (127) | 5.6 (21) | Pass Rating | 126.1 (117) | 104.0 (29) | Avg. NCAA Football Ranking | 41.2 | 56
|
Matchup | Golden Eagles Defense | Trojans Offense |
| | | Points/Game | 23.8 (109) | 33.3 (43) | Rush Yards/Game | 145.0 (125) | 175.4 (65) | Pass Yards/Game | 223.9 (177) | 246.0 (55) | Total Yards/Game | 368.9 (152) | 421.4 (39) | Third Down Pct. | 39.0% (130) | 36.1% (166) | Fourth Down Pct. | 45.5% (114) | 76.2% (235) | Sacks | 25 (90) | 9 (13) | Sack Yards | -162 (111) | -53 (9) | Rushing TDs | 12 (47) | 22 (79) | Passing TDs | 24 (214) | 25 (43) | Carries/Game | 393 (54) | 414 (142) | Yards/Carry | 4.4 (175) | 5.1 (33) | Completion Pct. | 58.1% (188) | 61.2% (72) | Yards/Pass Attempt | 6.7 (103) | 6.2 (182) | Pass Rating | 125.3 (123) | 125.6 (122) | Avg. NCAA Football Ranking | 86.9 | 59 |
Simulations:
- Final Score: Troy 32, Southern Miss 25
- Troy: Brown: 255 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT; Harris: 25 rushes, 102 yards, 1 TD; Defense: 4 sacks, 3 TOs
- Southern Miss: Davis: 206 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT; Fletcher/Davis/Floyd: 148 yards, 1 TD; Defense: 2 sacks, 3 TOs
My Thoughts: Here's a game that will come down to how well each team runs the ball. From the looks of it, both run it very effectively, and both seemingly cannot stop the run on defense. However, an X-Factor could be Levi Brown's effectiveness throwing the ball. Troy also turned some heads earlier this year at Columbus against Ohio State, and then again in Baton Rouge when, let's face it, they blew a chance to knock off LSU. I think Troy has not only the running game, but a passing game good enough to put some major points up on the board.
Troy (-4.5)
Tuesday, December 23
Poinsettia Bowl: Boise State vs. TCU (8:00, ESPN)
Head to Head Matchup | Broncos Offense | Horned Frogs Defense |
| | | Points/Game | 39.4 (13) | 10.9 (3) | Rush Yards/Game | 162.7 (91) | 48.7 (1) | Pass Yards/Game | 294.1 (19) | 166.4 (31) | Total Yards/Game | 456.8 (18) | 215.1 (3) | Third Down Pct. | 45.0% (44) | 29.0% (12) | Fourth Down Pct. | 66.7% (24) | 35.7% (191) | Sacks | 34 (227) | 43 (2) | Sack Yards | -248 (231) | -312 (2) | Rushing TDs | 27 (42) | 8 (16) | Passing TDs | 30 (22) | 8 (9) | Carries/Game | 429 (119) | 335 (8) | Yards/Carry | 4.6 (64) | 1.7 (1) | Completion Pct. | 68.5% (27) | 49.0% (5) | Yards/Pass Attempt | 8.8 (16) | 5.7 (26) | Pass Rating | 161.7 (15) | 96.6 (9) | Avg. NCAA Football Ranking | 44.2 | 14.5 | Matchup | Broncos Defense | Horned Frogs Offense |
| | | Points/Game | 12.3 (4) | 35.0 (35) | Rush Yards/Game | 104.9 (34) | 215.7 (26) | Pass Yards/Game | 189.6 (88) | 201.4 (130) | Total Yards/Game | 294.5 (29) | 417.1 (42) | Third Down Pct. | 30.9% (21) | 51.5% (8) | Fourth Down Pct. | 27.3% (12) | 60.0% (208) | Sacks | 11 (228) | 18 (81) | Sack Yards | -92 (209) | -141 (115) | Rushing TDs | 7 (12) | 37 (10) | Passing TDs | 8 (10) | 14 (160) | Carries/Game | 425 (103) | 591 (15) | Yards/Carry | 3.0 (24) | 4.4 (79) | Completion Pct. | 51.3% (147) | 58.2% (112) | Yards/Pass Attempt | 5.5 (13) | 7.2 (95) | Pass Rating | 94.3 (6) | 129.0 (102) | Avg. NCAA Football Ranking | 42.7 | 55.4 |
Simulations:
- Final Score: TCU 26, Boise State 21
- TCU: Dalton: 139 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT; Turner/Dalton/Brown: 32 rushes, 90 yards, 1 TD; Defense: 3 sacks, 3 TOs
- Boise State: Moore: 143 yards, 1 TD, 2 INTs; Johnson/Avery: 20 rushes, 56 yards, 1 TD; Defense: 2 sacks, 2 TOs
My Thoughts: As the simulations are indicating, this is going to be a really ugly, pound-it-out game. Personally, when I heard this matchup, I thought it was the best matchup not only of non-BCS bowl games, but perhaps overall the best matchup. Interesting stat: TCU has won three of its last four bowl games, while Boise State has lost three of its last four, with the one win being the memorable Fiesta Bowl game against Oklahoma. What I have a hard time getting over is TCU's strong suits. First of all, they have the second-best defense in the nation and lead the nation in rushing yards/carry on defense. They are 7th in the nation in 3rd Down conversions on offense. In the end, I just think Boise State will have no answer to the onslaught of defense the Horned Frogs bring.
TCU (-2.5)
Wednesday, December 25
Hawaii Bowl: Hawaii vs. Notre Dame (8:00, ESPN)
Head to Head Matchup | Warriors Offense | Fighting Irish Defense |
| | | Points/Game | 24.9 (132) | 22.3 (81) | Rush Yards/Game | 99.3 (208) | 142.7 (119) | Pass Yards/Game | 245.5 (57) | 184.8 (73) | Total Yards/Game | 344.8 (140) | 327.5 (79) | Third Down Pct. | 35.7% (171) | 33.5% (42) | Fourth Down Pct. | 46.2% (126) | 38.5% (45) | Sacks | 34 (226) | 19 (165) | Sack Yards | -226 (219) | -143 (140) | Rushing TDs | 18 (121) | 18 (130) | Passing TDs | 21 (73) | 12 (35) | Carries/Game | 393 (169) | 411 (80) | Yards/Carry | 3.3 (197) | 4.2 (159) | Completion Pct. | 58.7% (40) | 52.9% (39) | Yards/Pass Attempt | 7.2 (96) | 5.9 (34) | Pass Rating | 125.0 (128) | 105.8 (32) | Avg. NCAA Football Ranking | 95.6 | 57 |
Matchup | Warriors Defense | Fighting Irish Offense |
| | | Points/Game | 27.3 (153) | 22.7 (161) | Rush Yards/Game | 148.0 (138) | 113.4 (188) | Pass Yards/Game | 203.8 (121) | 231.4 (86) | Total Yards/Game | 351.8 (126) | 344.8 (141) | Third Down Pct. | 33.7% (43) | 34.9% (187) | Fourth Down Pct. | 57.7% (203) | 34.5% (189) | Sacks | 49 (1) | 20 (100) | Sack Yards | -293 (8) | -177 (158) | Rushing TDs | 17 (113) | 10 (209) | Passing TDs | 22 (193) | 20 (82) | Carries/Game | 481 (205) | 402 (159) | Yards/Carry | 4.0 (124) | 3.4 (191) | Completion Pct. | 56.7% (152) | 58.9% (99) | Yards/Pass Attempt | 7.0 (142) | 6.6 (144) | Pass Rating | 126.3 (132) | 122.3 (138) | Avg. NCAA Football Ranking | 84.3 | 101.5 |
Simulations:
- Final Score: Hawaii 27, Notre Dame 26
- Notre Dame: Clausen: 254 yards, 2 TDs, 2 INTs; Allen/Hughes/Aldridge: 26 carries, 93 yards, 1 TD; Defense: 4 sacks, 4 TOs
- Hawaii: Alexander: 254 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT; Libre/Pilares/Alexander: 27 carries, 114 yards, 1 TDs
My Thoughts: Notre Dame is just an atrocious team. Just plain bad. Plus, they haven't won a bowl game since '93. Hey, they're calling for a good game, and if the Irish win and prove me wrong, then so be it...but if you saw any of the ND/'Cuse game, can you honestly put any kind of monetary sum on ND's side in this game? Hawaii had a rough transition trying to get a suitable replacement for Colt Brennan. They seem to have found one in Greg Alexander, who is not afraid to bring the ball down and rush every once in a while, which is something that ND does not have an answer for. Hawaii is 3-0 in the Hawaii Bowl.
Hawaii (-1)
Friday, December 26
Motor City Bowl: Florida Atlantic vs. Central Michigan (7:30, ESPN)
Head to Head Matchup | Owls Offense | Chippewas Defense |
| | | Points/Game | 25.2 (130) | 30.8 (190) | Rush Yards/Game | 141.0 (131) | 138.6 (105) | Pass Yards/Game | 250.5 (46) | 285.7 (241) | Total Yards/Game | 391.5 (71) | 424.3 (214) | Third Down Pct. | 42.1% (82) | 43.8% (197) | Fourth Down Pct. | 16.7% (244) | 50.0% (17) | Sacks | 11 (14) | 31 (41) | Sack Yards | -67 (11) | -161 (108) | Rushing TDs | 15 (163) | 23 (190) | Passing TDs | 23 (62) | 23 (200) | Carries/Game | 380 (188) | 392 (52) | Yards/Carry | 4.5 (74) | 4.2 (155) | Completion Pct. | 53.0% (102) | 63.6% (218) | Yards/Pass Attempt | 7.1 (104) | 7.8 (206) | Pass Rating | 123.9 (133) | 142.8 (213) | Avg. NCAA Football Ranking | 70.7 | 106.7 |
Matchup | Owls Defense | Chippewas Offense |
| | | Points/Game | 29.3 (178) | 30.3 (64) | Rush Yards/Game | 183.5 (197) | 134.3 (147) | Pass Yards/Game | 218.7 (169) | 292.8 (20) | Total Yards/Game | 402.2 (196) | 427.1 (36) | Third Down Pct. | 38.3% (118) | 49.2% (18) | Fourth Down Pct. | 61.9% (220) | 26.7% (95) | Sacks | 12 (224) | 29 (197) | Sack Yards | -103 (196) | -201 (193) | Rushing TDs | 23 (197) | 19 (104) | Passing TDs | 21 (187) | 26 (32) | Carries/Game | 498 (220) | 453 (91) | Yards/Carry | 4.4 (181) | 3.6 (167) | Completion Pct. | 63.6% (181) | 65.7% (22) | Yards/Pass Attempt | 7.3 (178) | 8.0 (40) | Pass Rating | 137.4 (189) | 149.1 (30) | Avg. NCAA Football Ranking | 128.7 | 57.1 |
Simulations:
- Final Score: Central Michigan 39, Florida Atlantic 29
- Florida Atlantic: Smith: 278 yards, 2 TDs, 2 INTs; Pierre: 12 carries, 64 yards, 1 TD; Defense: 2 sacks, 2 TOs
- Central Michigan: LeFevour: 283 yards, 3 TDs, 1 INT; Sneed/LeFevour: 23 carries, 96 yards, 1 TD; Defense: 2 sacks, 4 TOs
My Thoughts: Whether you're aware of this or not, I am mega-huge on Dan LeFevour's game. This guy is a freak of nature. He passes (average QB rating of 156 in sims) and he is as good running the ball. He is the total package, and is the reason for the Chippewas' recent success. This is one of those games where you could pretty much shove any number you wanted in my face...I gotta go with my man LeFevour here.
Central Michigan (-7)
Saturday, December 27
Meineke Car Care Bowl: West Virginia vs. North Carolina (1:00, ESPN)
Head to Head Matchup | Mountaineers Offense | Tar Heels Defense |
| | | Points/Game | 24.0 (147) | 20.3 (52) | Rush Yards/Game | 217.2 (24) | 140.8 (113) | Pass Yards/Game | 135.3 (221) | 217.2 (167) | Total Yards/Game | 352.5 (129) | 357.9 (136) | Third Down Pct. | 39.2% (122) | 41.2% (162) | Fourth Down Pct. | 33.3% (203) | 27.8% (118) | Sacks | 24 (142) | 18 (170) | Sack Yards | -154 (124) | -100 (209) | Rushing TDs | 14 (166) | 14 (66) | Passing TDs | 19 (87) | 12 (34) | Carries/Game | 475 (64) | 442 (134) | Yards/Carry | 5.5 (13) | 3.8 (90) | Completion Pct. | 64.5% (170) | 60.1% (163) | Yards/Pass Attempt | 5.9 (194) | 6.0 (37) | Pass Rating | 132.3 (82) | 111.0 (45) | Avg. NCAA Football Ranking | 85.8 | 77.1 |
Matchup | Mountaineers Defense | Tar Heels Offense |
| | | Points/Game | 15.9 (14) | 27.5 (95) | Rush Yards/Game | 134.8 (93) | 125.1 (168) | Pass Yards/Game | 190.7 (93) | 192.3 (147) | Total Yards/Game | 325.5 (73) | 317.3 (178) | Third Down Pct. | 41.8% (170) | 42.6% (70) | Fourth Down Pct. | 33.3% (22) | 46.2% (232) | Sacks | 14 (199) | 27 (174) | Sack Yards | -90 (210) | -199 (192) | Rushing TDs | 14 (70) | 17 (128) | Passing TDs | 8 (5) | 18 (101) | Carries/Game | 446 (142) | 422 (128) | Yards/Carry | 3.6 (60) | 3.6 (164) | Completion Pct. | 55.7% (167) | 56.5% (149) | Yards/Pass Attempt | 5.7 (24) | 7.8 (47) | Pass Rating | 102.1 (24) | 135.1 (74) | Avg. NCAA Football Ranking | 62.1 | 93 |
Simulations:
- Final Score: West Virginia 27, North Carolina 23
- West Virginia: White: 102 yards 1 TD, 1 INT; Devine/White: 35 rushes, 164 yards, 2 TDs; Defense: 2 sacks, 3 TOs
- North Carolina: Yates: 74 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT; Draughn/Houston: 21 rushes, 100 yards, 1 TD; Defense: 1 sack, 2 TOs
My Thoughts: I actually had the "privledge" of seeing this bowl in Charlotte last year (privledge in quotes because a.) it was raining, b.) I was working, thus not getting the "full" experience if you know what I mean, and c.) UConn lost to a team from North Carolina (Wake Forest) who had a 80/20 fan disparity). What this will come down to is how well each team does in the red zone. West Virginia has the #1 defense in red zone scoring percentage, while UNC has struggled mightily in stopping opponents from scoring inside the 20. What cannot be overlooked is that there is a huge UNC following in Charlotte, and Chapel Hill is only about two hours down Route 85 from the QC. I think Pat White brings an element to the game that UNC is not used to or prepared for. Also, WVU's defense is deceptively good.
West Virginia (Pk)
Champs Sports Bowl: Wisconsin vs. Florida State (4:30, ESPN)
Head to Head Matchup | Badgers Offense | Seminoles Defense |
| | | Points/Game | 28.7 (83) | 20.8 (60) | Rush Yards/Game | 212.0 (28) | 126.8 (74) | Pass Yards/Game | 192.8 (146) | 164.9 (28) | Total Yards/Game | 404.8 (52) | 291.8 (27) | Third Down Pct. | 39.3% (120) | 26.1% (2) | Fourth Down Pct. | 63.6% (35) | 43.5% (33) | Sacks | 21 (95) | 36 (10) | Sack Yards | -132 (86) | -271 (6) | Rushing TDs | 31 (25) | 12 (41) | Passing TDs | 10 (200) | 14 (64) | Carries/Game | 529 (30) | 412 (82) | Yards/Carry | 4.8 (42) | 3.7 (77) | Completion Pct. | 53.9% (177) | 50.9% (12) | Yards/Pass Attempt | 7.3 (82) | 6.1 (43) | Pass Rating | 118.7 (158) | 110.6 (43) | Avg. NCAA Football Ranking | 61.8 | 27.4 |
Matchup | Badgers Defense | Seminoles Offense |
| | | Points/Game | 25.3 (128) | 32.7 (48) | Rush Yards/Game | 133.3 (87) | 182.8 (59) | Pass Yards/Game | 189.1 (86) | 185.8 (156) | Total Yards/Game | 322.3 (68) | 368.7 (103) | Third Down Pct. | 38.0% (113) | 44.8% (47) | Fourth Down Pct. | 33.3% (24) | 33.3% (150) | Sacks | 25 (84) | 24 (137) | Sack Yards | -162 (110) | -174 (154) | Rushing TDs | 21 (167) | 25 (54) | Passing TDs | 13 (48) | 16 (128) | Carries/Game | 412 (83) | 445 (97) | Yards/Carry | 3.9 (105) | 4.9 (35) | Completion Pct. | 51.5% (81) | 53.7% (190) | Yards/Pass Attempt | 6.2 (53) | 6.4 (165) | Pass Rating | 108.6 (37) | 113.2 (182) | Avg. NCAA Football Ranking | 57.9 | 77.5 |
Simulations:
- Final Score: Florida State 31, Wisconsin 26
- Wisconsin: Sherer: 163 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT; Hill/Clay: 28 rushes, 145 yards, 2 TDs; Defense: 2 sacks, 4 TOs
- Florida State: Ponder: 192 yards, 2 TDs, 2 INTs; Smith/Ponder/Thomas: 35 rushes, 182 yards, 2 TDs; Defense: 4 sacks, 4 TOs
My Thoughts: These two teams are ridiculously similar, and it's one of those games where I have no confidence in my pick...so there's a fair warning. Both teams are going to have big games on the ground. The main difference I can see is third down efficiency. The 'Noles are #2 in the country in defending against third downs. This is an increasingly prevalant number when you're talking about a team whose main means of moving the ball is on the ground. Plus, they are 14th in red zone defense, meaning they give up field goals instead of TDs.
Florida State (-5)
Emerald Bowl: Miami vs. California (8:00, ESPN)
Head to Head Matchup | Hurricanes Offense | Golden Bears Defense |
| | | Points/Game | 27.9 (92) | 20.2 (50) | Rush Yards/Game | 130.1 (153) | 122.5 (62) | Pass Yards/Game | 197.0 (139) | 192.9 (98) | Total Yards/Game | 327.1 (167) | 315.4 (49) | Third Down Pct. | 33.7% (199) | 30.3% (16) | Fourth Down Pct. | 64.7% (29) | 25.0% (38) | Sacks | 31 (202) | 33 (26) | Sack Yards | -239 (224) | -243 (16) | Rushing TDs | 17 (129) | 16 (98) | Passing TDs | 20 (78) | 10 (18) | Carries/Game | 394 (166) | 463 (176) | Yards/Carry | 4.0 (119) | 3.2 (38) | Completion Pct. | 57.3% (116) | 50.6% (10) | Yards/Pass Attempt | 6.4 (166) | 5.9 (33) | Pass Rating | 118.5 (159) | 97.1 (10) | Avg. NCAA Football Ranking | 97.2 | 33.5 |
Matchup | Hurricanes Defense | Golden Bears Offense |
| | | Points/Game | 24.2 (115) | 33.3 (42) | Rush Yards/Game | 146.4 (133) | 183.7 (57) | Pass Yards/Game | 169.3 (37) | 195.5 (144) | Total Yards/Game | 315.8 (51) | 379.2 (88) | Third Down Pct. | 37.4% (102) | 30.4% (225) | Fourth Down Pct. | 35.0% (32) | 33.3% (239) | Sacks | 27 (65) | 25 (150) | Sack Yards | -178 (85) | -183 (168) | Rushing TDs | 19 (136) | 20 (92) | Passing TDs | 14 (66) | 24 (47) | Carries/Game | 463 (174) | 405 (155) | Yards/Carry | 3.8 (91) | 5.4 (14) | Completion Pct. | 51.4% (26) | 52.9% (196) | Yards/Pass Attempt | 6.5 (83) | 6.2 (177) | Pass Rating | 117.7 (84) | 121.1 (147) | Avg. NCAA Football Ranking | 58.2 | 88.2 |
Simulations:
- Final Score: California 31, Miami 21
- Miami: Marve: 137 yards, 1 TD, 2 INTs; Cooper/James: 20 rushes, 60 yards, 1 TD; Defense: 4 sacks, 3 TOs
- California: Riley: 156 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT; Best/Vereen: 33 rushes, 180 yards, 2 TDs; Defense: 3 sacks, 3 TOs
My Thoughts: At first glimpse, I know what you're thinking. First, Miami is not what they once were...they've struggled, the sims look awful for them, but they played well on the road, and this game is essentially a road game. However, I have a hard time getting over two things:
- Miami has a really, really...really young team, and their youth and inexperience could be a potential downfall. Also, this is coach Randy Shannon's first bowl game.
- Miami had not allowed any opponent to rush for over 100 yards in their first ten games. In the last two, they allowed 691 to Georgia Tech and NC State.
Cal boasts one of the best backs that no one really knows about in Jahvid Best. He went off in his last two games. Granted, they were against Stanford and Washington, but still, 512 yards in two games is quite a feat. Look for Miami to be flat, and Cal to run all over them (sorry for teasing you in the beginning). Also, this game is being played at AT&T Park, where the Giants play...very cool.
California (-7)
Sunday, December 28
Independence Bowl: Northern Illinois vs. Louisiana Tech (8:15, ESPN)
Head to Head Matchup | Huskies Offense | Bulldogs Defense |
| | | Points/Game | 25.3 (126) | 24.8 (121) | Rush Yards/Game | 172.8 (70) | 100.3 (27) | Pass Yards/Game | 162.0 (195) | 279.9 (239) | Total Yards/Game | 334.8 (157) | 380.3 (167) | Third Down Pct. | 43.3% (61) | 37.3% (99) | Fourth Down Pct. | 58.8% (60) | 52.6% (37) | Sacks | 22 (113) | 26 (81) | Sack Yards | -128 (80) | -161 (107) | Rushing TDs | 22 (76) | 12 (44) | Passing TDs | 12 (179) | 24 (206) | Carries/Game | 470 (69) | 403 (66) | Yards/Carry | 4.4 (76) | 3.0 (23) | Completion Pct. | 57.6% (204) | 60.9% (183) | Yards/Pass Attempt | 7.2 (93) | 7.8 (205) | Pass Rating | 125.1 (126) | 138.0 (193) | Avg. NCAA Football Ranking | 76.6 | 81.7 |
Matchup | Huskies Defense | Bulldogs Offense |
| | | Points/Game | 18.1 (28) | 25.3 (125) | Rush Yards/Game | 140.3 (112) | 195.0 (46) | Pass Yards/Game | 162.5 (23) | 157.0 (202) | Total Yards/Game | 302.8 (40) | 352.0 (131) | Third Down Pct. | 40.4% (153) | 34.3% (195) | Fourth Down Pct. | 38.1% (52) | 33.3% (82) | Sacks | 16 (186) | 22 (120) | Sack Yards | -82 (219) | -140 (114) | Rushing TDs | 12 (45) | 22 (75) | Passing TDs | 13 (49) | 9 (213) | Carries/Game | 406 (69) | 492 (45) | Yards/Carry | 4.1 (139) | 4.8 (43) | Completion Pct. | 63.0% (96) | 46.2% (234) | Yards/Pass Attempt | 6.3 (60) | 6.0 (191) | Pass Rating | 125.6 (127) | 99.4 (217) | Avg. NCAA Football Ranking | 63.5 | 92.4 |
Simulations:
- Final Score: Northern Illinois 29, Louisiana Tech 24
- Northern Illinois: Harnish: 175 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT; Harnish/Spann/Brown: 27 rushes, 122 yards, 1 TD; Defense: 2 sacks, 3 TOs
- Louisiana Tech: Bennett: 133 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT; Porter/Jackson: 25 rushes, 124 yards, 1 TD; Defense: 1 sack, 3 TOs
My Thoughts: The Huskies are winning the sims, but I have to think that LA Tech, who has not been to a bowl since '01, will be pretty juiced for this game...as will their fans. Let's not forget that this is another one of those pseudo home games, so Tech will have a home field advantage playing in Shreveport. NIU lost three of its last four heading into this game, plus Tech is tough against the run.
Louisiana Tech (+1.5)
Monday, December 29
PapaJohns.com Bowl: North Carolina State vs. Rutgers (3:00, ESPN)
Head to Head Matchup | Wolfpack Offense | Scarlet Knights Defense |
| | | Points/Game | 23.5 (153) | 18.5 (32) | Rush Yards/Game | 125.5 (166) | 139.0 (108) | Pass Yards/Game | 200.8 (131) | 184.9 (74) | Total Yards/Game | 326.3 (170) | 323.9 (72) | Third Down Pct. | 36.7% (159) | 30.8% (18) | Fourth Down Pct. | 37.5% (179) | 53.8% (32) | Sacks | 23 (127) | 28 (64) | Sack Yards | -144 (108) | -185 (69) | Rushing TDs | 13 (180) | 14 (69) | Passing TDs | 18 (102) | 9 (12) | Carries/Game | 415 (140) | 442 (135) | Yards/Carry | 3.6 (165) | 3.8 (92) | Completion Pct. | 51.3% (164) | 61.1% (186) | Yards/Pass Attempt | 6.8 (122) | 7.8 (204) | Pass Rating | 119.2 (153) | 132.5 (166) | Avg. NCAA Football Ranking | 100.9 | 60.6 |
Matchup | Wolfpack Defense | Scarlet Knights Offense |
| | | Points/Game | 26.1 (137) | 29.0 (80) | Rush Yards/Game | 144.3 (123) | 128.8 (158) | Pass Yards/Game | 242.8 (199) | 266.3 (38) | Total Yards/Game | 387.1 (176) | 395.2 (68) | Third Down Pct. | 40.3% (150) | 41.2% (95) | Fourth Down Pct. | 52.6% (162) | 30.8% (70) | Sacks | 28 (57) | 19 (89) | Sack Yards | -189 (71) | -138 (111) | Rushing TDs | 16 (92) | 20 (90) | Passing TDs | 18 (137) | 24 (44) | Carries/Game | 409 (75) | 390 (178) | Yards/Carry | 4.2 (152) | 4.0 (120) | Completion Pct. | 62.6% (221) | 60.5% (85) | Yards/Pass Attempt | 7.1 (148) | 8.5 (21) | Pass Rating | 128.7 (147) | 145.3 (39) | Avg. NCAA Football Ranking | 93 | 58.5 |
Simulations:
- Final Score: Rutgers 33, North Carolina State 22
- NC State: Wilson: 186 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT; Brown/Eugene: 19 rushes, 70 yards, 1 TD; Defense: 2 sacks, 3 TOs
- Rutgers: Teel: 280 yards, 2 TDs, 2 INTs; Brooks/Young: 26 rushes, 130 yards, 2 TDs; Defense: 4 sacks, 2 TOs
My Thoughts: This line has gone bananas since opening at 4.5. I have found some sites with spreads as high as nine in favor of Rutgers. NC State is the only team with a sub-.500 record in the bowls. The 'Pack won their last four games, which in most games would give them the momentum edge...that is unless you're facing Rutgers, who have not only been beating teams, but running them over. The Knights have won six in a row. State has had a nice run, but ultimately, I don't think they will be able to slow Rutgers down in this game.
Rutgers (-7.5)
Alamo Bowl: Missouri vs. Northwestern (8:00, ESPN)
Head to Head Matchup | Tigers Offense | Wildcats Defense |
| | | Points/Game | 43.2 (7) | 19.3 (43) | Rush Yards/Game | 157.1 (101) | 127.7 (77) | Pass Yards/Game | 340.4 (7) | 215.3 (160) | Total Yards/Game | 497.5 (6) | 343.0 (110) | Third Down Pct. | 54.4% (5) | 33.9% (46) | Fourth Down Pct. | 38.5% (168) | 42.3% (36) | Sacks | 27 (167) | 33 (23) | Sack Yards | -207 (197) | -234 (25) | Rushing TDs | 28 (35) | 15 (80) | Passing TDs | 39 (7) | 11 (27) | Carries/Game | 387 (182) | 424 (98) | Yards/Carry | 5.3 (20) | 3.6 (63) | Completion Pct. | 72.4% (3) | 58.4% (129) | Yards/Pass Attempt | 8.5 (22) | 6.0 (38) | Pass Rating | 162.7 (13) | 112.9 (52) | Avg. NCAA Football Ranking | 42.7 | 45.8 |
Matchup | Tigers Defense | Wildcats Offense |
| | | Points/Game | 27.5 (155) | 24.5 (139) | Rush Yards/Game | 128.9 (80) | 147.6 (112) | Pass Yards/Game | 285.3 (240) | 209.4 (119) | Total Yards/Game | 414.2 (205) | 357.0 (121) | Third Down Pct. | 45.5% (215) | 45.7% (37) | Fourth Down Pct. | 53.8% (173) | 33.3% (159) | Sacks | 14 (200) | 15 (49) | Sack Yards | -89 (212) | -107 (58) | Rushing TDs | 19 (137) | 15 (152) | Passing TDs | 26 (224) | 17 (114) | Carries/Game | 470 (192) | 451 (95) | Yards/Carry | 3.6 (61) | 3.9 (133) | Completion Pct. | 64.3% (245) | 60.7% (80) | Yards/Pass Attempt | 6.9 (120) | 6.1 (186) | Pass Rating | 133.0 (170) | 116.9 (167) | Avg. NCAA Football Ranking | 119.5 | 78.2 |
Simulations:
- Final Score: Missouri 41, Northwestern 25
- Northwestern: Bacher: 206 yards, 2 TDs, 2 INTs; Simmons: 16 rushes, 46 yards, 1 TD; Defense: 2 sacks, 3 TOs
- Missouri: Daniel: 310 yards, 3 TDs, 2 INTs; Washington: 16 rushes, 114 yards; Defense: 2 sacks, 4 TOs
My Thoughts: I am totally in awe of the work that Pat Fitzgerald has done in revitalizing Northwestern's program this year. He has to be in consideration for coach of the year. Mizzou looked awful against Oklahoma in the Big XII Championship game...but again, if you played OU after the Texas game, that tended to happen. Still, the Tigers are reeling, and Chase Daniel hasn't looked close to his All-American self down the stretch. A thing to watch out for could be the return of Tyrell Sutton to NW. He had nearly 1500 yards rushing his freshman year, but injuries have limited his production the last three years. The sims did not account for his presence, and if he is on the field, it will be tough for Mizzou to contain this offense, especially with C.J. Bacher making plays on the run.
Northwestern (+13)
Alright, there is Part One. As mentioned before, I will be putting up the rest of the previews shortly, but at least these will get you all the way through Christmas. Plus, I have to pace myself here. I am so psyched how well the graphics came out for the stats. Special thanks to FoxSports.com for that. Their "head-to-head" feature is available for a ton of different sports, and while it doesn't factor in strength of schedule, it helps to get some kind of feel for what different teams tend to rely on, especially those who I haven't seen this year. NFL picks are right around the corner. The Celtics won their 16th in a row tonight, and the B's have the Maple Leafs tomorrow night. The hot stove is lukewarm at this juncture, but I will keep you informed if anything breaks. Good luck in your bowl pools. Peace.
~Mell-o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment